An Analysis of Richard Dawkins' Assumptions

By William Lane Craig in January 2009

About this video

Runtime: 5 mins

William Lane Craig discusses the assumptions that underlie Dawkins' arguments. He says that Dawkins' central argument in "The God Delusion" is flawed for several reasons. Dawkins claims you cannot infer God as the designer of the universe because it begs the question, "Who designed the designer?" This argument fails as it does not prove atheism but only questions the inference of God based on design. Moreover, requiring an explanation for the explanation leads to an infinite regress, undermining scientific inquiry. Additionally, a mind, despite its complex ideas, is a simple entity, countering Dawkins' assertion that a designer must be as complex as its designs.

Subscribe now to watch this video

This video is only available to subscribers.

Background

Produced in January 2009. Provisional captions.

Categories:

Share:

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe to newsletter